Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10

#Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10 Patch#
#Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10 pro#
#Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10 download#

Media Player Classic HC: Is that retro look and feel worth it? Media Player Classic HC is what the cool kids use. PotPlayer actually makes a point of touting РІР‚Сљenhanced hardware acceleration that provides the maximum performanceР’В with the minimum resource using DXVA, CUDA, QuickSync.РІР‚Сњ For my test, I used the default settings, and in battery life it was only slightly better than VLC. The UI is polished and it has overwhelming, head-spinning options. It also has a nifty featureР’В that lets it record screen captures along with Picture-in-Picture mode, and it supports 3D glasses. It claims to be able to play more files without the need for third-party codec packs. When it installs, it will prompt you to fetch additional video and audio codecs for installation. Like VLC, it can play files with missing or corrupted portions. IРІР‚в„ўll admit IРІР‚в„ўd never heard of PotPlayer before researching this article. PotPlayer has a head-spinning amount of things you can tweak, even when compared to its contemporaries. Maybe in addition to targeting Adobe Flash for public ridicule, you should also flog the QuickTime player now and then?

#Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10 download#

At least Apple doesnРІР‚в„ўt force you to download it with iTunes anymore, but it seems odd that Apple would hurl stones at Adobe while sitting inside of a house made of shimmering non-Gorilla Glass. I considered just dropping it from the test, but I decided itРІР‚в„ўd be a worthy public service advisory to remind people just how much of a fail QuickTime 7 is. mov file, which is AppleРІР‚в„ўs own QuickTime file format. I actually gave up after several attempts to make it work. On the Radius 12 with its Core i7 Skylake CPU, it could not even play the video file without constantly dropping frames. This has been a horrible player for years, and it hasnРІР‚в„ўt gotten any better. The fail boat was boarded by the QuickTime 7 player. The QuickTime Player is still horribly broken,Р’В and Apple doesnРІР‚в„ўt seem to care. On my laptop, when battery life matters, IРІР‚в„ўll have to skip it. VLCРІР‚в„ўs subtitle support is great and IРІР‚в„ўll still use it, but mostly on my desktop. Besides manually setting the screen brightness, all of the testing was also done with the default power settings for the OS.

#Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10 Patch#

Surface Book shootout.Р”Р„ll of the testing was done on Windows 10 before the TH2 patch was released, and in airplane mode.

#Potplayer vs media player classic for windows 10 pro#

I even used the same Samsung earbuds as I did with the MacBook Pro 13 vs. The screen was set at a relatively bright 260 nits (as close as I could get to 250) and the audio was on. MOV file with a resolution of 3840Р“вЂ”1714, encoded in H.264 using the high 5.1 profile. For my test, I wanted to keep the video expectations very high, so I used the same 6GB UltraHD 4K Tears of Steel video (open-source) thatР’В I used in my MacBook Pro 13 vs. I know from the excellent testing thatР’В РІР‚в„ўs Tim Schiesser ranР’В two years ago that lower resolution and lower bit rate increases battery life. I actually wanted a laptopР’В with a modest battery life rather than, say, MicrosoftРІР‚в„ўs Surface Book, which can take half a day to zero.Р’В Even if another laptop has a larger battery, or a smaller screen, however, I believe the results should scale.Р”Р‡or my video rundown test, I used the 4K version of the free open-source Tears of Steel short movie. Our rundown test used a Toshiba Radius 12 with a Core i7 Skylake CPU and 12-inch UltraHD 4K resolution screen.Р”Р‡or my testing platform, I picked ToshibaРІР‚в„ўs new Radius 12Р’В running Windows 10.Р’В The laptop gave me IntelРІР‚в„ўs latest Skylake CPU, a moderately sized battery, and, with its 4K panel, the low end of run time.